Subject: Re: [xsl] <no subject> From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 11:06:21 GMT |
> 3 what is wrong with this assumtion: if document() returns the root-node > of the referenced document and i copy everything into the tree fragment > of a xsl:variable coerce this afterwards into a node set (msxsl:node-set()) > i'd have rather the same as if i would use an entity instead of the Copying into a variable really does force the processor to copy the entire document tree. (Because the nodes in the copy have to have distinct identities from the nodes in the original) It would be much better to use the original document directly via document() (or equivalently use an empty variable binding and use select= rather than an xsl:choose inside the xsl:variable. It's supposed to work, perhaps if you posted a small example that failed, we'd see what was wrong. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] <no subject>, k . weitzer | Thread | Re: [xsl] <no subject>, Trevor Nash |
[xsl] <no subject>, k . weitzer | Date | Re: [xsl] Testing if something is n, Jeni Tennison |
Month |