Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. client-side From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:53:29 -0600 |
> you're joking, right? this is kind of like going to McDonalds and ordering a > Big Mac, large fries WITH A diet coke as opposed to a regular coke. If you want to argue about whether client side vs. server side in general can save electricity I don't think one could come up with a definitive answer. However, for the simple case of performing the same XSLT transform 1000 times in one place or another (no repetition on the client) I think it's pretty clear. So, no, it's not a joke... XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, cutlass | Thread | RE: [xsl] xslt on server-side vs. c, Hunsberger, Peter |
RE: [xsl] Reformatting character st, Burisch, Curtis | Date | Re: [xsl] following-sibling in for-, Jeni Tennison |
Month |