RE: [xsl] positional predicates in XPath vs XQL

["Howard Katz" <howardk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Fallacious raciotination obviously.

I'll bite. What is the correct result in the XPath case??

Howard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Christopher
> R. Maden
> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 7:45 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [xsl] positional predicates in XPath vs XQL
> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> At 15:35 23-11-2001, Howard Katz wrote:
> >In XQL if you say:
> >      /section/para[ 1 ]
> >and you have a tree that looks like this:
> >
> >1  section
> >2       para
> >3       para
> >4  section
> >5       para
> >6  section
> >7       para
> >8       para
> >9       para
> >
> >you'll get back this nodeset:
> >
> ><2>, <5>, <7>
> >
> >To my understanding, the same location path in XPath only 
> returns a single
> >node, <2>. Is my understanding correct?
> 
> No.  Whence did you acquire it?
> 
> ~Chris
> - -- 
> Christopher R. Maden, Principal Consultant, HMM Consulting Int'l, Inc.
> DTDs/schemas - conversion - ebooks - publishing - Web - B2B - training
> <URL: http://www.hmmci.com/ > <URL: http://crism.maden.org/consulting/ >
> PGP Fingerprint: BBA6 4085 DED0 E176 D6D4  5DFC AC52 F825 AFEC 58DA
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8
> 
> iQA/AwUBO/8XtaxS+CWv7FjaEQIgdQCeJJkgv+IE9KMt1glpCot9/r0nF/YAn3cM
> E9LJS5WYLPYO3ds6L5MIqPG8
> =g29q
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 
> 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list