Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates de-mystified From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:13:04 GMT |
> all return sequences in document order oops yes so they do:-) > Also note common error #2 - t This one I did know, even if my message fell into the hole:-) (although it would probably be less error prone if for changed the focus so that . was the inner most bound variable.) (Mike?) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates , Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates , Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] RE: Postional predicates , Jeni Tennison | Date | [xsl] Re: RE: Postional predicates , Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |