Subject: [xsl] Re: . in for From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:55:40 -0800 (PST) |
[snipped a very nice and perfectly understandable argumentation for a mapping operator] > I can see two drawbacks to using a simple mapping operator rather than > a for expression, because the context item is used rather than there > being explicit variable bindings for range variables: > > - you cannot iterate over several sequences at the same time > - you cannot have right operands that use the value of the item from > the left operand within a predicate Jeni, This is the only part of your message, which seems not to be 100% clear. Could you, please, provide concrete examples (expressions) that would be illegal/would not work? Cheers, Dimitre. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: Re: xpath2 functions , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: . in for, Jeni Tennison |
Where is the benefit ? (Was : RE: [, Kevin Jones | Date | Re: [xsl] RE: Re: xpath2 functions , David Carlisle |
Month |