Re: [xsl] Re: . in for

> (e.g. to do apply-templates) by calling a stylesheet function.

this (calling xslt from xpath rather than the other way round)
is I suspect going to lead to lots of entertaining and so far
unsuspected uses. 

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . in for), (continued) Michael Kay - Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:03:07 -0000 David Carlisle - Mon, 7 Jan 2002 23:20:13 GMT Jeni Tennison - Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:20:13 +0000 Michael Kay - Sat, 5 Jan 2002 18:23:54 -0000 David Carlisle - Sat, 5 Jan 2002 19:19:17 GMT <= Daniel Veillard - Sat, 5 Jan 2002 21:13:36 +0100 Jeni Tennison - Sun, 6 Jan 2002 12:49:38 +0000 Michael Kay - Sun, 6 Jan 2002 19:38:59 -0000

Current Thread

RE: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . in for), (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] Re: . in for, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: [xsl] Re: . in for, Daniel Veillard
RE: Where is the benefit ? (Was : R, Michael Kay	Date	Re: [xsl] Re: . in for, Daniel Veillard
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home