Subject: Re: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . in for) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:54:39 GMT |
Mike <xsl:variable name="emps" select="//employee[some $d in $departments satisfies lower-case(./@dept) = which reminds me, why is that $d and not d ? I always thought that the name of the variable was a Qname, and that the $ syntax referenced the _value_ of the variable. (note it is name="emps" not name="$emps") in some $d (and all the other similar new binding constructs in xpath2) the token in that position is binding a variable name, not referencing the value of a variable, so why does it have $? David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re, Michael Kay |
[xsl] another xpath question, Andrew Welch | Date | RE: [xsl] RE: Re: . in for, Michael Kay |
Month |