Subject: RE: Regular expression functions (Was: Re: [xsl] comments on Dece mber F&O draft) From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:19:26 -0600 |
> > It's just another way of matching templates, not a whole new concept??? > well it depends if you want to merge with apply-templates on text nodes > or whether you want to keep the normal templates on text nodes and have > these doing something else (I think) > I suppose having two attributes could be troublesome: what happens if they are both specified? Then again, that could be really powerful (talk about opening your self up to non-intuitive behavior!) However, if you need to separate out the behaviors I think modes would work just fine? All your regex cases might end up using the same mode, but at least you don't have to specify yet another tag... > anyway it wasn't a fully worked out proposal, i hadn't even seen it > written down before I stared replying to jeni's email, it just slipped > out:-) > > However I think something along those lines could be made workable. I haven't had the time to follow the whole discussion, but I hadn't seen anything along the lines of what you proposed before. It looked interesting enough that I actually had to stop and reply. I do suspect something like this could be useful. Peter Hunsberger XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Regular expression functions (W, Marc Portier | Thread | RE: [xsl] text() and not(), Joerg Pietschmann |
RE: [xsl] XPath 2.0, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] text() and not(), Joerg Pietschmann |
Month |