Subject: Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e From: Joerg Pietschmann <joerg.pietschmann@xxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:10:31 +0100 |
roger.day@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > FWIW, and I'm just a person on the top of a Clapham Omnibus, if it's gotten rid > of, there should be replacements - particularly for 4, which has recently bitten > me. That was emmitting a document declaration with an internal DTD subset into the result. > That's not an abuse - that's a workaround. Hmmmmmm. Are you *sure* you can't do this in any other fashion? For example, use the new multiple output facility to write a new DTD file and refer to it in the result using doctype-system in xsl:output. > However, isn't this covered by > http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#xml-output, Appendix F Representation of Lexical > XML Constructs (Non-Normative)? So cases 3 and 4 should be fixed in XSLT 2.0 > implementations....I think. My fix: drop DTD support (which includes dropping entity support). Use a XSchema instead. :-) :-) Regards J.Pietschmann XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e, Joerg Pietschmann | Thread | Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e, roger . day |
Re: [xsl] Content constructors and , Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: Regular expression functions (W, Jeni Tennison |
Month |