|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Converting logical <em>s to physical <i>s (nesting problem) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 23:54:44 GMT |
> How can I convert <em>s to <i>s, such that "nested" <em>s are either
> italic or not italic as appropriate? That is, I want
do you really have to flatten the structure of your sentences in this
way? An alternative would be to make em's all into
<span class="x{count(ancestor::em) mod 2}">
..
</span>
and just arrange that class x0 and x1 toggle the italic/upright font
style.
> By the way, what's the best was to "pass through" unknown tags? I
> currently use
>
> <xsl:template match="*">
> <xsl:element name="{name(.)}">
this is an example in the xslt 1 spec. replace your <xsl:element
name=..>
by <xsl:copy>
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] Converting logical <em>s to p, Michael Stillwell | Thread | [xsl] Fw: develop content managemen, Robert Koberg |
| RE: [xsl] Get an element with max. , bryan . s . schnabel | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: RE: Higher-Order Func, Terje Norderhaug |
| Month |