Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: we owe SUN? From: Peter.FLYNN@xxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 10:17:18 -0000 |
Surely it was a mistake to approve by default, as this creates more overhead for the patent office to investigate whether the patent is valid. Whereas the deny by default, would have at least caused the large companies to provide evidence of some proof of invention. How can Sun patent the fundamental way that XML/XSLT works? Its like patenting hyperlinks - its just stupid - because it is so widely used and developed. Surely the whole purpose of XSLT with XML is to generate content dependant on browser capability. If we can't work this way, then what is the point of continuing any further work with XSL development?? Regards, Peter Flynn ******************************************************************** This email may contain information which is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify the sender immediately and delete it without reading, copying, storing, forwarding or disclosing its contents to any other person Thank you Check us out at http://www.syntegra.com ******************************************************************** XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: we owe SUN?, Brinkman, Theodore | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: we owe SUN?, Goetz Bock |
[xsl] anyone know the XSLT incremen, Theory Guy | Date | RE: [xsl] self discovery, Andrew Welch |
Month |