Subject: RE: [xsl] RE:read-write same url in xslt 2 [was appendig to multiple output files] From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 10:57:34 -0800 |
Trevor Nash wrote: > >I did at one stage explore a different processing model in which > there was a > >single result tree, and xsl:document was treated as a serialization > >directive to produce multiple serial output files from a single tree. But > >that has complications too, and we abandoned it. > > Pity that: it is a real pain to have to effectively write the same > stylesheet logic twice in order to extract things like table of > contents information as well as the main output document. > > Its not just the implied performance hit, its the maintainability of > such a beast. I don't follow you. Mike wasn't suggesting that we abandoned xsl:result-document, but just the approach that treats it as a serialization directive (rather than, for example, a first-class document-node constructor). I don't see how this has anything to do with the maintainability of stylesheets... Am I missing something? That's always possible :-) Evan XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE:read-write same url in, Trevor Nash | Thread | [xsl] saxon in batch file for lots , ronald heller |
Re: [xsl] RE:read-write same url in, Trevor Nash | Date | Re: [xsl] RE:read-write same url in, Francis Norton |
Month |