| 
 
Subject: RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why XSLT is better than JSP+Velocit	y From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 16:31:38 -0600  | 
> They know Java, they argue, so why bother with XSLT? One good reason: Java doesn't do the job easily. Since they should be separation presentation from business logic (least of all database logic) they should already understand that Java is not a presentation language (not that HTML is much better, but that's another problem). There is a mismatch between the job to be done and the tool (Java). Having Java tools create XML for presentation manipulation via XSLt is a good architectural separation of function that allows each tool to do what it is good at. I would also agree that you should consider eliminating JSP's altogether. With a good XML/XSLt framework the days of having to mix presentation semantics and syntax should be rapidly disappearing. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread | 
|---|
  | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why X, Kurt Cagle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why X, Robert Koberg | 
| RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why X, Joshua Allen | Date | RE: [xsl] Need 3 good reasons why X, Hunsberger, Peter | 
| Month |