Subject: RE: [xsl] An issue with XPath 2.0 sequences (Was Re: RE: Muenchian method, and keys 'n stuff) From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:25:34 -0800 |
Mike Kay wrote: > Non-nested sequences are > sufficient to serve those two purposes; and nested sequences would serve > merely to increase the overlap and inconsistency between the > "trees" part of > the model (which is about handling XML documents) and the "variables" part > of the model (which is about doing computations). I agree. Hopefully it will serve as a good compromise between the two models. Evan XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] An issue with XPath 2.0 s, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] apply two different templ, Oliver Becker |
[xsl] XSL-FO: Absolute position wit, Joshua . Kuswadi | Date | [xsl] Re: No Subject [variable timi, Peter Davis |
Month |