Subject: [xsl] querystring parameters (II) From: Aniceto López <aniceto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:31:12 +0100 |
Bryan, you are right: xslt isn't a way to process http querystrings, but why not if we are working for the web most fo the cases? the reason? info going straight ahead where I need it not the longest way "querystring to asp generating xml containing the info to use in xslt" maybe this is a stupid idea but sometimes solutions come from this ones thanks for your opinion anyway Aniceto Lopez // -----Mensaje original----- // De: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx // [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]En nombre de Bryan // Rasmussen // Enviado el: martes, 05 de febrero de 2002 9:58 // Para: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx // Asunto: RE: [xsl] querystring parameters (II) // // // >NOT querystring -> asp -> xsl JUST querystring -> xsl // // in that case highly unlikely. I can't see the reason for it anyway, the // querystring collection contains info on the http querystring, xslt isn't a // way to process http. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] querystring parameters (I, Bryan Rasmussen | Thread | RE: [xsl] querystring parameters (I, Casadome, Francisco |
[xsl] RE: (Keys on multiple element, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] keep properties, Joerg Pietschmann |
Month |