Re: [xsl] keep properties

["Carmelo Montanez" <carmelo@xxxxxxxx>]

HI All:

    Thanks for all the replies to my topic.  I guess David P.
put a final end to it.  It is indeed the next sibling.

Carmelo
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Carlisle" <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:17 AM
Subject: Re: [xsl] keep properties


> 
> > Shall we interpret that as the very next FO (even if its a child)
> > or the next sibling.  Consider this scenario
> 
> I always understood it to be sibling.
> 
> David
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
> delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
> information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
> Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list