Subject: Re: [xsl] keep properties From: "Carmelo Montanez" <carmelo@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:58:37 -0500 |
HI All: Thanks for all the replies to my topic. I guess David P. put a final end to it. It is indeed the next sibling. Carmelo ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Carlisle" <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:17 AM Subject: Re: [xsl] keep properties > > > Shall we interpret that as the very next FO (even if its a child) > > or the next sibling. Consider this scenario > > I always understood it to be sibling. > > David > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet > delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further > information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call > Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] keep properties, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] keep properties, Joerg Pietschmann |
[xsl] dynamically select an element, yan bai | Date | RE: [xsl] Upper ASCII chars, Jay Burgess |
Month |