Subject: RE: [xsl] Java memory overload with FOP and RenderX From: naha@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 12:29:25 -0500 (EST) |
Quoting Joshua.Kuswadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > This is something that came up recently on fop-dev. For those FOP users > who may not have 1.256GB of RAM, of which I am one, the suggestion from > the posting was to use a different page-sequence for each major section > of your document. > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=100533062020062&w=2 In the old days, text justifiers would make two passes over the input document. The second pass was to insert the page numbers which were determined after the layout that was performed in the first pass. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Java memory overload with, Joshua . Kuswadi | Thread | [xsl] meta tag, Charly |
Re: [xsl] position() in templates, Wendell Piez | Date | [xsl] Variable scope issue., Nitin . Jain |
Month |