Subject: Re: [xsl] Q on incremental processing and count() From: "Perry Molendijk" <perry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:07:38 +0800 |
Infexions (WA) Pty LtdWouldn't give you the result you're after, no need for count() etc.. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> <xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"/> <xsl:template match="/"> <html> <head> <title>unique news</title> </head> <body> <xsl:apply-templates select="/table/row[position() mod 20 = 1]"/> </body> </html> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="row"> <table border="2" cellpadding="4"> <tr style="background-color:orange"> <th>table header</th> </tr> <xsl:for-each select=". | following-sibling::row[position() < 20]"> <tr> <td> <xsl:value-of select="."/> </td> </tr> </xsl:for-each> </table> <p/> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> That seemed to work pretty well in MSXML 3, Saxon and Xalan Perry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Enke Michael" <Michael.Enke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 10:30 PM Subject: Re: [xsl] Q on incremental processing and count() > Joerg Heinicke wrote: > > > > Hello Michael, > > > > it's not clear what you want to do. Your variables are ok, no problems to > > see. You only can shorten them: > > > > <xsl:variable name="col-num" select="10"/> > > > > <xsl:variable name="col-num" select="count(thead/th-row)"/> > > > > <xsl:variable name="col-num" select="count(thead[1]/th-row)"/> > > > > Between the two last declarations there should be no difference, because of > > your XML. > > > > But what exactly is the problem? What's the result you get and you expect? > > What's the context of the variable declaration? > > > > Regards, > > > > Joerg > > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > My problem is the execution speed. > I have a large table (200 entries) and split them into small tables (per > table 20 entries, every subtable with the same table header). > My problem is: The browser gets the result if all 200 entries are processed in > the memory! Arrrrgggg... > But I expected to see the tables as they come out of the database. > Because for investigating I made it so, that every item needs half a second > to be generated. > I expected to see the first sub table after 20*0.5 seconds, the second table > after 2*20*0.5 seconds and so on. > But actually I see all tables not before 200*0.5 seconds :-( > > If I remove the count() and ...following-sibling... I lost my > table structure but I can see how the values come out as they > were produced. > > Regards, > Michael > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] SOLVED! was: Q on incremental, Enke Michael | Thread | Re: [xsl] Q on incremental processi, Enke Michael |
Re: [xsl] Lookup (?), Carsten Klein | Date | Re: [xsl] duplicate id's, Perry Molendijk |
Month |