RE: [xsl] Memory problem with "document()"

[Paul Terray <terray@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 11:37 04/03/2002 +0000, you wrote:
> There's no obvious way to do this in Saxon, and I would advise trying to run
> it as a collection of small transformations rather than one big one.

The reason why we are trying to do it this way is because there is a big 
XML instance to parse, and we don't want to parse it each time we transform 
a small document.

Is there another way to keep a parsed instance in memory between two 
transformations ?


--
Paul TERRAY - Documents Management Systems Engineer
email : terray@xxxxxxxxxxxx 


XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list