| Subject: Re: [xsl] XML parsers performance From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 11:49:51 -0700 (MST) | 
Bovone Stefano wrote: > I'm dealing with XML parsers performance. In your experience what is the > speeder parser ? speedier, you mean. You should ask this question on xml-dev, not xsl-list. > Do I have to choose a C++ or a Java parser ? Well pretty much as a rule, an application written in C will be faster than a similar application written in Java. However these days you can throw so much hardware at the problem, you might achieve acceptable speeds on any platform. - Mike ____________________________________________________________________________ mike j. brown | xml/xslt: http://skew.org/xml/ denver/boulder, colorado, usa | resume: http://skew.org/~mike/resume/ ^ yes, i am looking for work XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] XML parsers performance, Bovone Stefano | Thread | Re: [xsl] XML parsers performance, Daniel Veillard | 
| [xsl] failure calling extension fun, Leona Slepetis | Date | RE: [xsl] question regarding Saxon , Michael Kay | 
| Month |