Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: RE: What is the correct behaviour of vendor:node-set($x) when x is empty? From: "Oleg Tkachenko" <olegt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:37:40 +0200 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of > Dimitre Novatchev > Therefore, would it be possible, ***please***, to produce a short, > one-paragraph specification for vendor:node-set(), which says that it > should also accept node-sets, including the empty one? > > I regard this as a "mini-EXSLT", just covering the > vendor:node-set() function, which is a de-facto standard, but appears > to lack a specification... Yes, I think it would be extremly useful but how could we force xslt implementors to adhere that spec? Anyway such kind of community-approved spec would be much better than nothing. --- Oleg Tkachenko, Multiconn International, Israel XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: RE: What is the correct b, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl]: Using saxon-fop - NullPoint, TSchutzerWeissmann |
Re: [xsl] Schema Exploration..., Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] Schema Exploration..., Mark R. Diggory |
Month |