Subject: RE: [xsl] last(): selecting the last one? From: Jarno.Elovirta@xxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:11:42 +0300 |
Heppa, > Yes. This was the reason. Why xsl:copy-of makes the link and value-of > does not? Because xsl:value-of converts the RTF into a string by a call to the string function and the string value of the RTF in this case is the text node inside the link, whereas xsl:copy-of doesn't convert it to string. See XSLT spec on xsl:value-of and xsl:copy-of, and XPath on string value of a node. Cheers, Santtu XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] last(): selecting the las, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] Re: last(): selecting the las, Dimitre Novatchev |
RE: [xsl] Schema location in target, Oleg Tkachenko | Date | Re: [xsl] last(): selecting the las, David Carlisle |
Month |