Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT performance under Linux From: Daniel Veillard <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 08:49:58 +0200 |
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 02:30:26AM +0200, Mattias Konradsson wrote: > > > > I would recommend working with the xsltproc engine. It's C++ based, > supports > > a healthy subset of the Saxon parser, and is fast. I had something of a > > jury-rigged system where I was calling saxon as a jar from the command > line > > (invoked from an `` expression in perl) and my system was crawling despite > > being on a top of the line computer. I replaced it with xsltproc, and it > was > > a couple of orders of magnitude faster. It should be in most recent Linux > > distros, though it's also up on Source Forge. > > > > -- Kurt Cagle > > Cool, just a couple of questions before I start fiddling around with a new > parser :) > > 1. Is there any performance comparision between it and other parsers, > roughly? Grab a copy of the German IX magazine from April 2002 there is some comparisons in the "Schnell XML" article. > 2. What's a healthy "subset", what doesn't it support? I must have support > for almost the full XSLT spec yes > + that it needs to be able to handle iso-8859-1 properly for output encoding > and params passed to it. Sablotron gave me some angst in this department. output encoding yes, for parameters, it will take XPath expressions encoded in UTF8 Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT performance under Li, Robert Koberg | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT performance under Li, Kurt Cagle |
Re: [xsl] XSLT performance under Li, Robert Koberg | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT performance under Li, Janning Vygen |
Month |