Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT/XPath 2.0 (was "Identifying two tags...") From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 08:45:10 -0400 |
I'd also add to Jeni's note that if you (or anyone else) are in favor of a conformance level for XSLT 2.0 that does not require XML Schema validation,
we would like to hear about it, including any specific requirements for what such a conformance level would entail. You may have a better chance of success if you put your hopes in a conformance level, rather than trying to fight the inclusion of XML Schemas altogether.
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT/XPath 2.0 (was "Iden, Wendell Piez | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT/XPath 2.0 (was "Iden, sara . mitchell |
RE: [xsl] FO Problem with large dat, Sadasivakurup, Jiji | Date | [xsl] why is this invalid in xml?, Jakub . Valenta |
Month |