Subject: RE: [xsl] A better way to build a comma-delimited list From: "Varley, Roger" <Roger.Varley@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 15:45:15 +0100 |
I've no idea how to do it in XSL, but could you not change the processing logic. Could you not have a special case for the first column you find and then for subsequent colomns output ", col(X)" so you could be missing any of the colmns and your string should still be correct. Regards Roger ************************************************************************ Information in this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please notify the sender and delete the message immediately. Unauthorised disclosure, distribution and copying of this email is strictly prohibited. The opinions expressed within this message are those of the individual author. Whilst Brakes takes reasonable steps to scan this email it does not accept liability for any virus that may be contained in it. Brake Bros plc. Registered Office: Enterprise House, Eureka Business Park, Ashford, Kent TN25 4AG. Registered in England & Wales number 2035315. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] A better way to build a c, John Sands | Thread | RE: [xsl] A better way to build a c, TSchutzerWeissmann |
Re: [xsl] A better way to build a c, Joerg Heinicke | Date | [xsl] Namespace declarations in the, Mia Chase |
Month |