Subject: RE: [xsl] XALAN-C++ Performance... From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 09:28:07 +0100 |
>Comparing Xalan-C++ using a wrapper around another implementation's DOM and Saxon using its >native implementation is hardly a fair comparison. Of course it's fair. It provides a counterweight to all those people who compare Xalan with its own native tree implementation to Saxon with a third-party DOM! Actually the lesson is important. All XSLT processors perform better if they are allowed to build the tree themselves than if you supply a DOM that was built using unrelated software. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XALAN-C++ Performance..., David N Bertoni/Camb | Thread | [xsl] SetInclude Code Fragment, NILESH PATEL |
RE: [xsl] comparison of attribute v, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] How to do serversite tran, Michael Kay |
Month |