Subject: Re: [xsl] xsltproc (was Re: XSL-List Digest V4 #417) From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:36:58 -0400 |
What about Xalan C++? Free, Linux and Windows versions. Worth trying. Tom P [Matt Gushee] > Zack Brown asked: > > > Any recommendations for an xslt processor that: > > > * is freely available for Linux > > * is at least as fast as xsltproc > > Unlikely. My understanding is that xsltproc is the fastest XSLT > processor in existence, with the possible exception of MSXML. > > Most popular XSLT processors are written in Java, Python, or Perl: > Saxon, Xalan, 4XSLT ... xsltproc is faster than them by a wide and > probably permanent margin. > > I guess Sablotron is pretty fast, but I have heard it has standards- > compliance issues. Haven't really used it myself, so that's all > second-hand information. > > -- > Matt Gushee > Englewood, Colorado, USA > mgushee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.havenrock.com/ > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] xsltproc (was Re: XSL-List Di, Matt Gushee | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsltproc (was Re: XSL-Lis, Kevin Jones |
Re: [xsl] Escaping newlines in an X, Thomas B. Passin | Date | Re: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, Thomas B. Passin |
Month |