Re: [xsl] James Clark on Schema

Mike> I don't think we have allowed the
Mike> existence of these types to bloat the language at all.

I just tried (again) to read section 6 of F&O. I find it hard to
reconcile what I see there with your statement above.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, (continued) Michael Kay - Thu, 6 Jun 2002 19:08:25 +0100 Wendell Piez - Fri, 07 Jun 2002 11:44:03 -0400 J.Pietschmann - Sat, 08 Jun 2002 21:12:54 +0200 bryan - Mon, 10 Jun 2002 10:09:27 +0200 David Carlisle - Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:14:06 +0100 <= Jeni Tennison - Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:37:40 +0100 Jeni Tennison - Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:59:41 +0100 Mark Wonsil - Thu, 6 Jun 2002 12:06:33 -0400 Francis Norton - Wed, 05 Jun 2002 13:52:52 +0100

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, bryan	Thread	Re: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, Jeni Tennison
Re: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, Thomas B. Passin	Date	Re: [xsl] James Clark on Schema, Jeni Tennison
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home