Subject: [xsl] Best practices From: "CROFT, MICHAEL" <MCROFT@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 10:17:22 -0400 |
>From a design standpoint, what is the "defacto" way to test for an empty element? Ive used the boolean function, and simple tests for <element>='', which I dont care to do, its difficult to read. Mike ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender and postmaster@xxxxxxxxxx ********************************************************************** XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] problem solved + xml.load que, Meir | Thread | Re: [xsl] Best practices, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] xsl:function, Dominic Blythe | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl:function, David Carlisle |
Month |