RE: [xsl] Support for XSL-FO

Subject: RE: [xsl] Support for XSL-FO
From: "Roland Neilands" <rneilands@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 10:04:30 +1000

> http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect1/N303.html
>
> Half way down, XSL-FO Processors.
>
> RenderX, Arbortext and Antenna House are all commercial offerings.
> fop and PassiveTex are not.
>
> Of the two, I've heard better reports of PassiveTex, if
> you can get your head round the tex installation.
>

Another, requires Websphere so I never bothered, but others may be
interested:
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/xfc

Regards,
Roland


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] Support for XSL-FO, (continued) Matthew L. Avizinis - Wed, 19 Jun 2002 22:55:35 -0400 James Fuller - Thu, 20 Jun 2002 06:43:56 +0100 Michael Kay - Thu, 20 Jun 2002 23:58:23 +0100 DPawson - Thu, 20 Jun 2002 10:38:07 +0100 Roland Neilands - Fri, 21 Jun 2002 10:04:30 +1000 <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] Support for XSL-FO, DPawson	Thread	[xsl] Piping, Dhruvraj Singh
RE: [xsl] Support for XSL-FO, Michael Kay	Date	[xsl] Testing for presence of node, Joel Konkle-Parker
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home