Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 format-number() question From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:23:10 -0600 (MDT) |
Michael Kay wrote: > The standard conversion rules for passing arguments to functions in > XPath 2.0 are documented in the XPath 2.0 specification > (http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/) section 2.2.4. I suspect there are bugs > in the current description of these rules, but the general principles > are sound. I think the XSLT spec probably shouldn't say anything about > the conversions that are applied, this is entirely an XPath matter. Right, but I still think the first sentence you wrote, above, or even just a mention that XPath 2.0 is the place to look, would be better than "the standard conversion rules". There doesn't seem to be any drawback to being just slightly more specific. - Mike ____________________________________________________________________________ mike j. brown | xml/xslt: http://skew.org/xml/ denver/boulder, colorado, usa | resume: http://skew.org/~mike/resume/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 format-number() , Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Re: AW: Article: An XSL Calcu, Dimitre Novatchev |
[xsl] Microsoft msxml3.0 v. msxml4., Sean Hayes | Date | Re: [xsl] Microsoft msxml3.0 v. msx, Mike Brown |
Month |