RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?

Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 17:46:44 -0400
Mike,

At 03:11 PM 7/1/2002, you wrote:
It's not that difficult. Saxon doesn't quite achieve this today but it
will in the next release (I just tested it).

X[position() = 1 and name()='factorof']

can be statically rewritten as

X[1][name()='factorof']

That's cool!


Will it do the same for X[name()='factorof' and position()=1] ?

Cheers,
Wendell


====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread