Subject: Re: [xsl] The Future of Browser-Bound XML? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 23:12:35 +0100 |
I removed CC: thelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx as cross posting to xsl-list isn't allowed. > There's XSLT... much more powerful, but it basically just converts your > XML back to HTML... kind of defeats the purpose of doing away with HTML > in the first place? Not at all. That was always the idea: that the XML data should have a transformation/style language to specify rendering on teh client, which still has teh original data and so can do other things with it in addition to just rendering. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] The Future of Browser-Bou, Christopher R. Maden | Thread | [xsl] content management mailing li, Robert S. Koberg |
Re: [xsl] extracting tags from a co, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] XSLT and Foreign Namespace At, Christopher Dix |
Month |