| Subject: Re: [xsl] 8bit ascii encoding From: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 10:49:30 +0100 | 
David Carlisle wrote at 27 Aug 2002 09:34:00 +0100: > I think that the utf-8 bom was a later addition to utf8 so as to > legalise the output of certain programs originating in Seatle wasn't it? > But yes, you are right. That depends on which standard you read. The UTF-8 BOM was listed alongside the UTF-16/UCS-2 BOM in an annex to ISO/IEC 10646-1:1993 long before the UTF-8 BOM got its first Unicode mention (in the Unicode 3.0 book, I believe). Regards, Tony Graham ------------------------------------------------------------------------ XML Technology Center - Dublin mailto:tony.graham@xxxxxxx Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708 Hamilton House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3 x(70)19708 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] 8bit ascii encoding, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] 8bit ascii encoding, David Carlisle | 
| RE: [xsl] 8bit ascii encoding, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] XML + XSLT = SVG using FO, David Carlisle | 
| Month |