Subject: RE: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:31:01 +0100 |
> I don't know, I recently saw some benchmarks for xalan(c++ > version) running against large(10+ mb) xml files and it > performed worst out of the processors involved, msxml > performed best(can't remember where I read this). I suppose > one reason for datapower's product would be that it handles > large xml files quickly, in that context and if xalan indeed > does perform poorly against large files it does not seem to > be a good comparison. > Hey, you wouldn't expect them to compare themselves against the *best* of the competition, would you? This is a US software company, after all, not a team of gentleman cricket players. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt, bryan | Thread | RE: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt, Robert Koberg |
RE: [xsl] How to do for-each on nod, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt, Robert Koberg |
Month |