Subject: RE: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 12:18:34 +0100 |
> Another memory related issue: It would be a great thing if > the processors could separate out and cache just once > xsl:includes/imports and some link them into a Templates object. > ... > > I know I asked about this a year or so ago and it was not > possible then (Saxon and Xalan). Is this possible today? > It's certainly possible in theory. However, I think a very considerable amount of the work that's currently done at compile time would end up being done at link time, so linking the modules dynamically for each transformation might not give great performance. I'm currently working on a different approach, which is to make sure that all the unused variables, templates etc from imported modules are discarded from the compiled stylesheet. This creates a few problems for things like saxon:evaluate(): which actually confirms the reasons some implementors were reluctant to put an evaluate() function in the spec. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt, Robert Koberg | Thread | RE: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt, Robert Koberg |
[xsl] Problem...while using Java wi, Mukul . Mudgal | Date | [xsl] test if attribute contains va, thomas |
Month |