Subject: Re: [xsl] Partial Implementation of XInclude include element From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 00:25:49 +0100 |
> So: which behavior is more correct? Or have I inadvertantly turned on a > convenience feature of Saxon? hard to say without seeing your stylesheet but if you have a literal result element in a template then the resulting element in the result tree will have namespace nodes for every namespace in scope on teh literakl result element except the xslt namespace and namespaces listed as extension namespaces or exclude-result-prefixes. So most likely if fo namepsace is declared on xsl:stylesheet it will end up in the output unless you take pains to stop it. If you mean thatthe built in engine produces something that isn't namespace well formed ie it has elements in a fo: namespace but without any namespace declaration for fo: then that is certainly a bug in the XSLT engine. The output should never have missing namespace decls. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Partial Implementation of, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] Partial Implementation of, W. Eliot Kimber |
Re: [xsl] Partial Implementation of, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] Hitting the same node wit, David Carlisle |
Month |