| Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl uk? From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:16:51 +0100 | 
> and on that point any indication on when XSLT 2.0 moves on to > final WD then Candidate Rec and finally Rec...... W3C doesn't typically publish dates. There's a good reason for that: members are not contrained by published plans when they vote for or against publication. > I think that > XSLT 2.0 will never happen, in the light of the issues > swirling around XPATH / XQuery. I think it will happen, though one can never predict the way people will vote. The number (or size) of outstanding technical issues is definitely on a downward trend. > > would be nice to see another implementation of XSLT 2.0 also; > any indication from implementators on this ? > I heard reports that Apache have started a Xalan development branch for 2.0, but I've now idea how far it's progressed. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] xsl uk?, James Fuller | Thread | [xsl] recursive templates calling r, Peter Doggett | 
| RE: [xsl] recursive templates calli, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] PDF to FO tool?, jeremyf | 
| Month |