Subject: Re: [xsl] Understanding axis From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:02:05 GMT |
> return the same values. I would have thought... > > local-name( */child::* ) > local-name( */*/* ) > > would be the same (which they aren't). I can't see why you should think they are the same, the rule is fairly simple that if you don't specify an attribute it is child:: so */*/* is child::*/child::*/child::* just as x/y/z is child::x/child::y/child::z > Could somebody help me reason out why it is this way? I can't see what you would want the rule to be, why do you want the child attribute to be inferred on one * and not the other? <xsl:for-each select="*/child::*[local-name()=$v]"> </xsl:for-each> read as I only want */* where they have a child named $v. I am not sure what you mean. */* is all grandchildren, do you mean the grandchildren have children named $v, that would be */*[*[local-name()=$v]] David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Namespaces and the identi, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Understanding axis, Jeni Tennison |
[xsl] Populating frames in a frames, Ung, Rosie | Date | Re: [xsl] Understanding axis, Jeni Tennison |
Month |