Subject: RE: [xsl] Selecting nested unique values, Muench approach not a good fit? From: "Conal Tuohy" <conalt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:41:16 +1300 |
Chris - it seems to me the Muenchian approach will serve you well. You are on the right track there. You could define a key like this: <xsl:key name="chunk-seeds" match="seed" use="concat(ancestor::chunk/name,.)" /> ..so that the index includes the seed and also the chunk's name. Then the seeds inside different chunks would have a unique index and wouldn't interfere with each other. Warning! Untested! :-) Con > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of > chrislott@xxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2002 16:30 > To: XSL-List@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [xsl] Selecting nested unique values, Muench approach not a > good fit? > I read about and tried the Muench approach using xsl:key, the > key function, > and generate-id to select the first node that matches a > particular key value > so as to avoid visiting duplicates. <snip/> > It seems that if the seed names could be made unique across > chunks, the > Muench approach might work. I.e., if the first chunk has seed names > "chunk1-0", "chunk1-1", etc. and the next chunk has seed names > "chunk2-0", "chunk2-1", etc. If this is the only way to XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Selecting nested unique value, chrislott | Thread | [xsl] setting variables in xslt, Stevenson Ngila |
Re: [xsl] XML translation problem u, Bix | Date | [xsl] Element value, Endre, MAGYARI |
Month |