Subject: Re: [xsl] Interesting issue From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:15:47 GMT |
(you could have picked a better subject line for this thread) > <lxslt:script lang="javascript"> I didn't check in detail what that javascript was doing, but It looks like you would be better just coding the functionality in XSLT. If you must do it in javascript you would be better to generate DOM nodes and then convert to an Xpath node set using whatever mechanism xalan provides for that. As it is you haven't generated any element nodes at all you've just generated a string with < and > in. You could in some circimstances use disable-output-escapingso that such a string gets output as XML markup, but use of disable-output-escaping is always non portable and a sign that something is wrong. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Interesting issue, Nischal Muthana | Thread | Re: [xsl] Interesting issue, Nischal Muthana |
RE: [xsl] Interesting issue, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] The beginning of xslt?, Michael Leditschke |
Month |