|
Subject: RE: [xsl] Proposal: Copying with Sorting From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 18:41:26 -0000 |
XSLT 2.0 allows you to create a sorted sequence of nodes using the
sort() function, with named sort keys:
<xsl:sort-key name="sk1">
<xsl:sort select="exp2"/>
</xsl:sort-key>
<xsl:copy-of select="sort('sk1', exp)"/>
Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Dimitre Novatchev
> Sent: 05 January 2003 09:01
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [xsl] Proposal: Copying with Sorting
>
>
> I would like to propose a simplification of the most widely
> used case of sorting, when a the members of a node-set are
> simply copied in a different order.
>
> The proposal is to allow xsl:sort to be a child of xsl:copy-of.
>
> Thus instead of writing [1]:
>
> <xsl:for-each select="expression">
> <xsl:sort select="expression2"/>
> <xsl:copy-of select="."/>
> </xsl:for-each>
>
>
> one would simply write [2]:
>
> <xsl:copy-of select="expression">
> <xsl:sort select="expression2"/>
> </xsl:copy-of>
>
>
> What are the advantages of having [2]?
>
> 1. The new instruction is more compact and simpler.
>
> 2. It reflects the principle that it should be possible to do simple
> things in a simple way.
>
> 3. Shorter, simpler, more readable and maintainable xslt code.
>
> 4. Probably allows a more efficient implementation.
>
> 5. The programmer will not have to worry whether to use (gasp!) an
> xsl:for-each or an xsl:apply-templates with or without mode.
>
> 6. Eliminates the vast number of programming errors, when the
> programmer simply forgets to specify <xsl:copy-of
> select="."/> in
> [1]
>
>
> A further simplification will be achieved if a "sort"
> attibute is allowed in case of sorting on a single key only.
>
> Then we could write [3]:
>
> <xsl:copy-of select="expression" sort="expression2" />
>
>
> I would appreciate receiving any comments on this proposal.
> Would you like to have this feature proposed for inclusion in
> XSLT 2.0?
>
>
>
>
> =====
> Cheers,
>
> Dimitre Novatchev.
> http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] Proposal: Copying with Sortin, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Proposal: Copying with So, Dimitre Novatchev |
| RE: [xsl] [OT] charset (was: how to, Julian Reschke | Date | RE: [xsl] key grouping with non-exi, Michael Kay |
| Month |