Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transforma

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)

Subject: Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)
From: "Charles White" <chuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 07:51:42 -0800

Actually, not through the namespaces, obviously, since the namespace is what
it is, but maybe through versioning (like 2.0 and 2.1)?

Chuck White
Author, Mastering XSLT, Sybex Books
http://www.javertising.com/webtech
http://www.tumeric.net

> Wouldn't the easiest way to handle two levels of conformance be to simply
> create two different recommendations with two different namespaces?


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation), (continued) Elliotte Rusty Harold - Wed, 5 Feb 2003 09:36:06 -0500 Elliotte Rusty Harold - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:45:02 -0500 Michael Kay - Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:55:14 -0000 Charles White - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 07:12:10 -0800 Charles White - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 07:51:42 -0800 <= Wendell Piez - Tue, 04 Feb 2003 11:33:23 -0500 S Woodside - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:59:43 -0500 Tobias Reif - Wed, 05 Feb 2003 12:54:05 +0100 David . Pawson - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:35:12 -0000

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation), (continued)
- David . Pawson - Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:35:12 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Charles White	Thread	RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Wendell Piez
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Tobias Reif	Date	[xsl] get the first of the followi, Cedric Claus
	Month