|
Subject: RE: xslt core and intuition was RE: [xsl] Reference to variable c annot be resolved. From: "Kienle, Steven C [IT/0200]" <steven.c.kienle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 07:56:34 -0500 |
Actually, I'm not sure an intuitive language is good, or even possible.
Look at all spoken languages. In the programming world, using C as an
example, there are many things which can be intuitively understandable with
enough knowledge of the core, but end up causing more bugs than that
intuition is worth: for example
if (i = j)
as an assignment and non-zero value test. That really does make intuitive
sense if you understand the history of the language.
I'd rather have a language which is easy to learn, doesn't allow flaws like
the above, even if it has no "intuitive-ity".
Steve
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] [XSLT2] setting context i, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: xslt core and intuition was RE:, Martinez, Brian |
| Re: [xsl] Reference to variable can, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Reference to variable can, Andrew Welch |
| Month |