Re: [xsl] The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0

Subject: Re: [xsl] The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0
From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:34:59 +0100

[declaring version 1.0 on the root element of an XSLT 2.0 transformation]

If the XSLT says it's 1.0, it should contain nothing but XSLT 1.0. Anything else will lead to madness, IMHO.

Tobi


--
http://www.pinkjuice.com/

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0, (continued) Michael Kay - Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:15:37 -0000 Charles White - Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:15:44 -0800 Kurt Cagle - Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:29:41 -0800 Michael Kay - Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:07:10 -0000 Tobias Reif - Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:34:59 +0100 <= Dimitre Novatchev - Wed, 19 Feb 2003 20:51:51 +0100 Michael Kay - Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:19:15 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:56:40 +0100 Kurt Cagle - Wed, 19 Feb 2003 14:19:37 -0800

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] The Perils of Sudden Type, Michael Kay	Thread	[xsl] Re: The Perils of Sudden Type, Dimitre Novatchev
RE: [xsl] Re: The Perils of Sudden , Michael Kay	Date	[xsl] Re: Re: The Perils of Sudden , Dimitre Novatchev
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home