<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: [xsl] is there really a need for location steps of ".."?

Subject: Re: [xsl] is there really a need for location steps of ".."?
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:59:25 -0500
At 11:21 AM 3/12/2003, I wrote:
(The fact that ancestor:: is a reverse axis has a bearing on which node you'll get back, for example, from //part/ancestor::*[1], but not on the "order of nodes" in a set.)

I should have said *nodes*, of course, unless there's only one part.

Cheers!
Wendell



___&&__&_&___&_&__&&&__&_&__&__&&____&&_&___&__&_&&_____&__&__&&_____&_&&_
    "Thus I make my own use of the telegraph, without consulting
     the directors, like the sparrows, which I perceive use it
     extensively for a perch." -- Thoreau


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re: [xsl] is there really a need fo, Robert P. J. Day Thread [xsl] dynamic XPath?, Yue Ma
[xsl] Auto-Numbering, Jack Cane Date [xsl] Looping on a set value while , Alex Dragowski
Month