Subject: [xsl] Templates Producing Similar Output From: "Peter Eschenbrenner" <cen_sys@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:48:44 -0600 |
I am of the opinion that similar items should be built/managed using the same templates. I am building SQL statements and like the idea of having the same template produce statements to pull data out and put it back in. I am not worried as much about performance as I am about maintainablility. SELECT client.datecreated, UPDATE datecreated='$db_client_datecreated', INSERT (datecreated, ...) VALUES ( '$db_client_datecreated', ...) SELECT <tableName />.<fieldName />, ... UPDATE <fieldName />='$db_<tableName />_<fieldName />', ... INSERT (<fieldName />, ... ) VALUES ( '$db_<tableName />_<fieldName />', ...) The first part of INSERT is the same as SELECT but without the <tableName />. prefix. The last part of INSERT is the same as UPDATE but without the <fieldName />= prefix. So as I see it there are two options: SELECT would have one template UPDATE would have one template INSERT would have two templates -- OR -- SELECT and INSERT would share a template with a parameter UPDATE and INSERT would share a template with a parameter Question: Should I build the templates to be shared? Peter Eschenbrenner (XSL newbie) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] many to one OR one to man, Fabien Triolet | Thread | [xsl] Grouping and Subtotals, David Petersen |
[xsl] many to one OR one to many?, Jason White | Date | Re: [xsl] many to one OR one to man, Robert P. J. Day |
Month |