|
Subject: Re: [xsl] match nodes based on given path From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:00:23 +0100 |
Mike> I think your match pattern is precisely equivalent to: Argggggggggg It is of course (as are the three variants I just posted) Mike> Which probably means you were trying to test for some other condition, Mike> but I've no idea what. No. That _is_ what the test is for, but I suggested a key based on partial information:-) That simplifies things considerably! David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] match nodes based on give, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] match nodes based on give, Andrew Welch |
| [xsl] Looking to understand how thi, Kathy Burke | Date | RE: [xsl] Self index?, David . Pawson |
| Month |