Subject: [xsl] document not there ambiguity (was: bug? warning given as error) From: S Woodside <sbwoodside@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:18:27 -0400 |
The spec states in section 12.1 Multiple Source Documents
"If there is an error retrieving the resource, then the XSLT processor
may signal an error; if it does not signal an error, it must recover
by returning an empty node-set."
So both behaviours are correct.
....and people wonder why the different implementations are so incompatible....
Really...what where the W3C thinking? Perhaps someone should start a list of 'standard implementation choices for implementing the xslt standard' (rolls eyes) and maybe that'll become YAWNS (Yet Another W3C uNsuccessful Standard).
-- anti-spam: do not post this address publicly www.simonwoodside.com -- 99% Devil, 1% Angel
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Can XSLT be used to parse, Américo Albuquerque | Thread | [xsl] Variable Depth Section Tabs i, burnett |
Re: [xsl] controller stylsheet. per, "Braumüller, Hans" | Date | Re: [xsl] count of how many times a, S Woodside |
Month |