RE: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types in XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0

At 10:11 14/05/2003 -0700, you wrote:

So, as has been said before, I think the function's
names are too long.

Rob,

See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003May/0001.html

and the response at

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003May/0006.html

So, one approach to simplifying is on the agenda already.

If you have an alternate / better suggestion, then I would echo Michael Kay's response to you - make your comment officially on the public-qt-comments list.

Andrew Watt

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types in XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0, (continued) me - Wed, 14 May 2003 10:11:42 -0700 (PDT) Kurt Cagle - Olywa - Wed, 14 May 2003 10:45:30 -0700 Mike Haarman - Wed, 14 May 2003 17:44:49 -0500 Michael Kay - Wed, 14 May 2003 19:19:03 +0100 Andrew Watt - Wed, 14 May 2003 19:39:12 +0100 <= Mike Haarman - Thu, 15 May 2003 01:10:40 -0500 Michael Kay - Thu, 15 May 2003 14:01:20 +0100 Mike Haarman - Fri, 16 May 2003 04:58:17 -0500 David . Pawson - Fri, 16 May 2003 09:28:58 +0100

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types in XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0, (continued)
- me - Wed, 14 May 2003 10:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
  - Kurt Cagle - Olywa - Wed, 14 May 2003 10:45:30 -0700
    - Mike Haarman - Wed, 14 May 2003 17:44:49 -0500
  - Michael Kay - Wed, 14 May 2003 19:19:03 +0100
- Andrew Watt - Wed, 14 May 2003 19:39:12 +0100 <=
- Mike Haarman - Thu, 15 May 2003 01:10:40 -0500
  - Michael Kay - Thu, 15 May 2003 14:01:20 +0100
    - Mike Haarman - Fri, 16 May 2003 04:58:17 -0500
- David . Pawson - Fri, 16 May 2003 09:28:58 +0100

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types i, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: [xsl] Using or ignoring Types i, Mike Haarman
[xsl] re-ordering an instance to ma, S Woodside	Date	Re: [xsl] re-ordering an instance t, S Woodside
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home